Logiweb aspects of lemma sameBase(1/2)Sum second base in pyk

Up Help

The predefined "pyk" aspect

define pyk of lemma sameBase(1/2)Sum second base as text unicode start of text unicode small l unicode small e unicode small m unicode small m unicode small a unicode space unicode small s unicode small a unicode small m unicode small e unicode capital b unicode small a unicode small s unicode small e unicode left parenthesis unicode one unicode slash unicode two unicode right parenthesis unicode capital s unicode small u unicode small m unicode space unicode small s unicode small e unicode small c unicode small o unicode small n unicode small d unicode space unicode small b unicode small a unicode small s unicode small e unicode end of text end unicode text end text end define

The predefined "tex" aspect

define tex of lemma sameBase(1/2)Sum second base as text unicode start of text unicode capital s unicode small a unicode small m unicode small e unicode capital b unicode capital s unicode left parenthesis unicode two unicode right parenthesis unicode left parenthesis unicode capital b unicode small a unicode small s unicode small e unicode right parenthesis unicode end of text end unicode text end text end define

The user defined "the statement aspect" aspect

define statement of lemma sameBase(1/2)Sum second base as system Q infer all metavar var m end metavar indeed all metavar var n2 end metavar indeed for all objects metavar var n2 end metavar indeed 0 = metavar var n2 end metavar imply base(1/2)Sum( metavar var m end metavar , 0 ) = base(1/2)Sum( metavar var m end metavar , metavar var n2 end metavar ) end define

The user defined "the proof aspect" aspect

define proof of lemma sameBase(1/2)Sum second base as lambda var c dot lambda var x dot proof expand quote system Q infer all metavar var m end metavar indeed all metavar var n2 end metavar indeed 0 = metavar var n2 end metavar infer lemma eqSymmetry modus ponens 0 = metavar var n2 end metavar conclude metavar var n2 end metavar = 0 cut 1rule base(1/2)Sum zero modus ponens metavar var n2 end metavar = 0 conclude base(1/2)Sum( metavar var m end metavar , metavar var n2 end metavar ) = 1/ 1 + 1 ^ metavar var m end metavar cut lemma eqSymmetry modus ponens base(1/2)Sum( metavar var m end metavar , metavar var n2 end metavar ) = 1/ 1 + 1 ^ metavar var m end metavar conclude 1/ 1 + 1 ^ metavar var m end metavar = base(1/2)Sum( metavar var m end metavar , metavar var n2 end metavar ) cut lemma base(1/2)Sum zero exact conclude base(1/2)Sum( metavar var m end metavar , 0 ) = 1/ 1 + 1 ^ metavar var m end metavar cut lemma eqTransitivity modus ponens base(1/2)Sum( metavar var m end metavar , 0 ) = 1/ 1 + 1 ^ metavar var m end metavar modus ponens 1/ 1 + 1 ^ metavar var m end metavar = base(1/2)Sum( metavar var m end metavar , metavar var n2 end metavar ) conclude base(1/2)Sum( metavar var m end metavar , 0 ) = base(1/2)Sum( metavar var m end metavar , metavar var n2 end metavar ) cut all metavar var m end metavar indeed all metavar var n2 end metavar indeed 1rule deduction modus ponens all metavar var m end metavar indeed all metavar var n2 end metavar indeed 0 = metavar var n2 end metavar infer base(1/2)Sum( metavar var m end metavar , 0 ) = base(1/2)Sum( metavar var m end metavar , metavar var n2 end metavar ) conclude 0 = metavar var n2 end metavar imply base(1/2)Sum( metavar var m end metavar , 0 ) = base(1/2)Sum( metavar var m end metavar , metavar var n2 end metavar ) cut 1rule gen modus ponens 0 = metavar var n2 end metavar imply base(1/2)Sum( metavar var m end metavar , 0 ) = base(1/2)Sum( metavar var m end metavar , metavar var n2 end metavar ) conclude for all objects metavar var n2 end metavar indeed 0 = metavar var n2 end metavar imply base(1/2)Sum( metavar var m end metavar , 0 ) = base(1/2)Sum( metavar var m end metavar , metavar var n2 end metavar ) end quote state proof state cache var c end expand end define