Logiweb aspects of prop lemma from disjuncts in pyk

Up Help

The predefined "pyk" aspect

define pyk of prop lemma from disjuncts as text unicode start of text unicode small p unicode small r unicode small o unicode small p unicode space unicode small l unicode small e unicode small m unicode small m unicode small a unicode space unicode small f unicode small r unicode small o unicode small m unicode space unicode small d unicode small i unicode small s unicode small j unicode small u unicode small n unicode small c unicode small t unicode small s unicode end of text end unicode text end text end define

The predefined "tex" aspect

define tex of prop lemma from disjuncts as text unicode start of text unicode capital f unicode small r unicode small o unicode small m unicode capital d unicode small i unicode small s unicode small j unicode small u unicode small n unicode small c unicode small t unicode small s unicode end of text end unicode text end text end define

The user defined "the statement aspect" aspect

define statement of prop lemma from disjuncts as system Q infer all metavar var a end metavar indeed all metavar var b end metavar indeed all metavar var c end metavar indeed not0 metavar var a end metavar imply metavar var b end metavar infer metavar var a end metavar imply metavar var c end metavar infer metavar var b end metavar imply metavar var c end metavar infer metavar var c end metavar end define

The user defined "the proof aspect" aspect

define proof of prop lemma from disjuncts as lambda var c dot lambda var x dot proof expand quote system Q infer all metavar var a end metavar indeed all metavar var b end metavar indeed all metavar var c end metavar indeed not0 metavar var a end metavar imply metavar var b end metavar infer metavar var a end metavar imply metavar var c end metavar infer metavar var b end metavar imply metavar var c end metavar infer 1rule repetition modus ponens not0 metavar var a end metavar imply metavar var b end metavar conclude not0 metavar var a end metavar imply metavar var b end metavar cut prop lemma contrapositive modus ponens not0 metavar var a end metavar imply metavar var b end metavar conclude not0 metavar var b end metavar imply not0 not0 metavar var a end metavar cut prop lemma technicality modus ponens metavar var a end metavar imply metavar var c end metavar conclude not0 not0 metavar var a end metavar imply metavar var c end metavar cut prop lemma imply transitivity modus ponens not0 metavar var b end metavar imply not0 not0 metavar var a end metavar modus ponens not0 not0 metavar var a end metavar imply metavar var c end metavar conclude not0 metavar var b end metavar imply metavar var c end metavar cut prop lemma contrapositive modus ponens not0 metavar var b end metavar imply metavar var c end metavar conclude not0 metavar var c end metavar imply not0 not0 metavar var b end metavar cut prop lemma contrapositive modus ponens metavar var b end metavar imply metavar var c end metavar conclude not0 metavar var c end metavar imply not0 metavar var b end metavar cut 1rule ad absurdum modus ponens not0 metavar var c end metavar imply not0 metavar var b end metavar modus ponens not0 metavar var c end metavar imply not0 not0 metavar var b end metavar conclude metavar var c end metavar end quote state proof state cache var c end expand end define