Logiweb aspects of prop three four d two in pyk

Up Help

The predefined "pyk" aspect

define pyk of prop three four d two as text unicode start of text unicode small p unicode small r unicode small o unicode small p unicode space unicode small t unicode small h unicode small r unicode small e unicode small e unicode space unicode small f unicode small o unicode small u unicode small r unicode space unicode small d unicode space unicode small t unicode small w unicode small o unicode end of text end unicode text end text end define

The predefined "tex" aspect

define tex of prop three four d two as text unicode start of text unicode newline unicode capital p unicode small r unicode small o unicode small p unicode backslash unicode space unicode three unicode period unicode four unicode small d unicode underscore unicode two unicode end of text end unicode text end text end define

The user defined "the statement aspect" aspect

define statement of prop three four d two as system s infer all metavar var a end metavar indeed all metavar var b end metavar indeed all metavar var c end metavar indeed metavar var a end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar equal metavar var b end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar imply metavar var a end metavar equal metavar var b end metavar imply metavar var a end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar suc equal metavar var b end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar suc imply metavar var a end metavar equal metavar var b end metavar end define

The user defined "the proof aspect" aspect

define proof of prop three four d two as lambda var c dot lambda var x dot proof expand quote system s infer all metavar var a end metavar indeed all metavar var b end metavar indeed all metavar var c end metavar indeed all metavar var a end metavar indeed all metavar var b end metavar indeed all metavar var c end metavar indeed metavar var a end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar equal metavar var b end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar imply metavar var a end metavar equal metavar var b end metavar infer metavar var a end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar suc equal metavar var b end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar suc infer axiom s six conclude metavar var a end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar suc equal metavar var a end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar suc cut axiom s six conclude metavar var b end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar suc equal metavar var b end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar suc cut axiom s one modus ponens metavar var a end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar suc equal metavar var a end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar suc modus ponens metavar var a end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar suc equal metavar var b end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar suc conclude metavar var a end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar suc equal metavar var b end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar suc cut prop three two c modus ponens metavar var a end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar suc equal metavar var b end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar suc modus ponens metavar var b end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar suc equal metavar var b end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar suc conclude metavar var a end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar suc equal metavar var b end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar suc cut axiom s four modus ponens metavar var a end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar suc equal metavar var b end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar suc conclude metavar var a end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar equal metavar var b end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar cut rule mp modus ponens metavar var a end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar equal metavar var b end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar imply metavar var a end metavar equal metavar var b end metavar modus ponens metavar var a end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar equal metavar var b end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar conclude metavar var a end metavar equal metavar var b end metavar cut deduction modus ponens all metavar var a end metavar indeed all metavar var b end metavar indeed all metavar var c end metavar indeed metavar var a end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar equal metavar var b end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar imply metavar var a end metavar equal metavar var b end metavar infer metavar var a end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar suc equal metavar var b end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar suc infer metavar var a end metavar equal metavar var b end metavar conclude metavar var a end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar equal metavar var b end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar imply metavar var a end metavar equal metavar var b end metavar imply metavar var a end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar suc equal metavar var b end metavar plus metavar var c end metavar suc imply metavar var a end metavar equal metavar var b end metavar end quote state proof state cache var c end expand end define